Out of sheer curiosity, there were a list of questions as equal to that of a kid’s wish that comes on its way. Here are a list of few of them proceeding to the artificialism from the naturalism. Its a ‘new’ system and finally i say a ‘wow’ which gets the name, ‘newow’ and i dont like to see letters being redundant on the new word. Hence removing those ‘w’, which is already ‘double u’ the name ‘neo’ for the system evolved.

To be written

The system that could move by itself. All that i would like to see is:

1. The system that supports itself in terms of mobility on flat surfaces, as flat as a plane of glass.
2. It should have an inherent ‘gripping’ thing that should keep it stable on very smooth surfaces.
3. Got bored of translating on the smooth surfaces, it should be able to identify the ‘bumps/cavities’ on almost flat surfaces as flat as a flat land.
4. Again, it should have a capability to control its own speed of traversal when passing over a bump/cavity.
5. Mastered the above? Lets have a wish of making it compatible to move on surface which has both smooth/rough type texture which is almost flat. Lets see how it controls its own speed to make its movement uniform.
6. Let the system move on a surface which has sharp bumps, or a steep up/down terrain.
7. No wonder it should be able to raise up and jump down on stairs at my home.
8. The tricky little system passed the above? Here is one, lets place some ‘objects’ that would try to make the system fall when its trying to get across any surface, isnt? Does the system expects such kind of surfaces/obstacles?
9. That, which could move along with me and adjust its speed with mine and that could run with me (to catch a bus?).
10. As this system grows, new interfaces comes into existance. It had to move in the surfaces where certain areas are robbed by yet-another material state, yes, it should also move when there is acceptable level of water on the surface. Dont we do it? The rains would provide a better illustration.
11. Is it struck up when its windy? Teach it how to get along those hurdles.
12. OOPS! No place to move? The available place is too narrow? Hey, the system is not too ‘cuby’ to not being able to readjust itself in terms of shape. It should be able to shear, bend and do stuff to get through and out of the narrow cavity.
13. Finally, our system just has jumped into a large circular disc. But oops! the disc is being rotated. So what? It should be able to move even in that surface, considering its motion is always relative and the displacement that it intends to achieve or the target point it tends to move is obviously a relative one. I expect that to know not the relativity theory but the relativistic factor in motion.

Not in all cases movement is quite useful. Say, you are on the tip of a mountain. Normally you dont rock and roll (though its rocky) over there, unless you are tied to safety.

1. The system is expected to be immobile if it sees the movement could cause not a conventional event getting triggered.
2. The system is not just a dummy stuff, but it should know, movement of it at certain point could not only cause itself in danger, at times, even others. Lets say you and me on the hill top and this neo should not do an inertial jerk that could put us in the brim of detachment from the rock’s horizon for a free fall.
3. Surface consideration should be built in. Say you’ve polished your marbled floor, this system should not go have a dance on the surface, spoiling it. Planning to make its balancing plates a more polished one for this compensation? No, it would restrict the above requirements! This also holds when you’ve plastered a surface.

“Hey, i cant sit with is just another mechanical system, its too boring” - if you feel like this, here are few requirements.

1. Know to make sounds of reasonable frequencies at appropriate time(Will be explained in further requirements).
2. Are those sounds meaningful? Or is it just a whistling, at times pleasure and generally more of a noise? Make it atleast to murmur few tunes (Beethovan/Bach?).
3. Even that is not completely interesting. Its boring, isnt? Ok, lets make another wish: Let the system speak like we do.
4. A little bit curiosity would fade away soon. Yes, it just speaks as we do, but doesnot respond or we were not able to understand that it speaks? Wait for a while, cant make hay, its fogging here!
5. Happy that its able to make sounds as we do. Also it does produces good tunes. Guess its better for the music directors to recruit it. Here our neo has got a job before it has got evolved! [Just kidding]

Rather complicated and extensive requirements, we require the system to be packed with senses! To be written

Here we go, our last but one requirement from the artificial evolution of the ‘neo’. Why not make the system cry or be happy for whatever it does? Isnt it true that we should pay the system accordingly to the work it does? If so, yes, it has to have a self paying mechanism that would keep its actions balanced. To be written

Last, but not the least, the most complicated of all requirements! This part would never be complete, since we the architect are not completely aware of what our requirements are and how it has to be! To be written

Yes, the requirements that we were able to provide was very less. Indeed, it doesnt even cover one tenth of the actual work that is being done by the system. No wonder, given enough time, even a monkey that hits the cozy typewritter would type out Carrol’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’, would create Sherlock Holmes and Dr.Watson and would even type the text found in the treaty of independence! That has what happened now! The system from the virtual world of dreams has emerged into a much more sophisticated, complex and functionally precise and efficient system, yes, its not different, its you, me and its all the homo sapiens, designed by no one, but an invisible yet sensible architect, THE NATURE. Lets stand for her invention and yet would try to find the incompleteness among ourselves to discard them, so as to make the evolutionary process a fruitful one.